Why are Java primitive types' modifiers `public`, `abstract`, & `final`?

Posted by oconnor0 on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by oconnor0
Published on 2012-11-01T15:46:30Z Indexed on 2012/11/01 17:01 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 191

Filed under:
|

In the process of doing some reflection on Java types, I came across an oddity that I do not understand.

Inspecting int for its modifiers returns public, abstract, and final. I understand public and final, but the presence of abstract on a primitive type is non-obvious to me. Why is this the case?

Edit: I am not reflecting on Integer but on int:

import java.lang.reflect.Modifier;

public class IntegerReflection {
    public static void main(final String[] args) {
        System.out.println(String.format("int.class == Integer.class -> %b", int.class == Integer.class));
        System.out.println(String.format("int.class modifiers: %s", Modifier.toString(int.class.getModifiers())));
        System.out.println(String.format("Integer.class modifiers: %s", Modifier.toString(Integer.class.getModifiers())));
    }
}

The output when run:

int.class == Integer.class -> false
int.class modifiers: public abstract final
Integer.class modifiers: public final

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about java

Related posts about reflection